Ask Question
26 December, 21:12

When discussing "companions in guilt," Mackie is referring to ... a. moral philosophers who are responsible for people's confusion about ethics. b. nonmoral properties that share the alleged "queerness" of moral ones. c. criminals who act immorally. d. ethical theories that Mackie takes to be false.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 26 December, 21:47
    0
    The answer is - B. Nonmoral properties that share the alleged "queerness" of moral ones

    Explanation:

    Companions in guilt arguments (CGAs) by Lillehammer H. is an argument for for ethical objectivity. J. L Mackie's book is on Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, in which she develops a term "The argument from queerness" which studies ethics. When Mackie is discussing Companions in guilt he is referring to nonmoral properties that share the alleged "queerness" of moral ones
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When discussing "companions in guilt," Mackie is referring to ... a. moral philosophers who are responsible for people's confusion about ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers