Rodolfo Nash

4 March, 01:59

Cross-filing allowed for candidates to be designated on two political party ballots when those parties had similar platforms nonpartisan and independent candidates to list their candidacy on other party ballots candidates to file to run under multiple party designations, thus reducing the meaning of party identification candidates to run for more than one office

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “Cross-filing allowed for candidates to be designated on two political party ballots when those parties had similar platforms nonpartisan ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

What term is used to describe a country in which the state is governed according to, and is a defender of, a particular religion?

What happened in Yugoslavia after the end of Communism? - Several countries became one. -Several countries were made. -Yugoslavia no longer exists. -Peace was found amongst all the people.

Living together in a sexual relationship without being married is known as

Is participating in a demonstration?

Nika owns land in Ohio. Her ownership rights include the right to sell or give away the property without restriction, and the right to commit waste, if she chooses.

New Questions in Social Studies

How might ikea's positive ethical behavior and social responsibility benefit the company?

The factors that affect the productivity of both camera pats and drone pats include

Where did the Greeks believe that most gods lived

A school nurse has completed an educational program for parents of the preschool children. Which statement by a participant indicates a need for further education?

1. Which of the following statements is NOT true? Race is a universal idea that has been around as long as human societies have. Race has often been used to justify social inequality as "natural" and therefore inevitable.