Ask Question
8 April, 10:21

The United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona held that criminal confessions cannot be used in a court case unless the suspect was fully informed of his or her rights, in order to uphold the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Use the passage to answer the question.

What was a long-term effect of this decision?

A.

Police in Arizona were forced to release suspects upon arrest.

B.

Police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest.

C.

Police in Arizona relied more on evidence than on confessions.

D.

Police nationwide relied more on evidence than on confessions.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 8 April, 12:07
    0
    b

    Explanation:

    I think, i learned this earlier in the year and my test had a question similar to this one, if it's not b then it's definitely
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona held that criminal confessions cannot be used in a court case unless the suspect ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers