The majority decision in Griswold v. Connecticut argued that a constitutional right to privacy can be found in the "zone of privacy" created by

a. the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments.

b. the Second, Eighth and Twelfth amendments.

c. the civil liberties listed in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution.

d. the Third, Fourth, and Fifth amendments.

Answer is D. The Third, Fourth, and Fifth amendments.

Refer below.

Explanation:

The majority decision in Griswold v. Connecticut argued that a constitutional right to privacy can be found in the "zone of privacy" created by:

The Third, Fourth, and Fifth amendments.

Answer: D. the Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments.

Explanation: In Griswold, the Supreme Court found a right to privacy, derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The Court used the personal protections expressly stated in the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments to find that there is an implied right to privacy in the Constitution.

. In Griswold v. Connecticut, the Court held that the right of privacy within marriage predated the Constitution. The ruling asserted that the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments also protect a right to privacy.

The right to privacy is alluded to in the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath.