Ask Question
8 November, 22:44

n Simons and Chabris's (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challenging perceptual task, counting the white team's basketball passes while ignoring the black team's basketball passes. Because of the challenging nature of the task

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 9 November, 01:30
    0
    In Simons and Chabris's (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challengingperceptual task, counting the white team's basketball passes while ignoring the black team's basketball passes. Because of the challenging nature of the task:

    A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur

    B. Attentional capture of irrelevant stimuli is more likely to occur

    C. Attention shift capacity is less likely to occur

    D. The spotlight model of attention is needed to explain the data

    Answer:

    A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur

    Explanation:

    Inattentional blindness often referred to as Perceptual blindness is a term in psychology which describes the failure of an individual or observer to notice or perceive a fully visible but unexpected object, due to the attention being given or channeled to another task at that moment.

    This is a phenomenon that was first coined by Irvin Rock and Arien Mack, in 1992, both are psychologists.

    The most common experiments demonstrating inattentional blindness is the "invisible gorilla test" carried out by Christopher Chabris, Ph. D. and Daniel Simons, Ph. D.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “n Simons and Chabris's (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challenging perceptual task, counting the white team's basketball ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers