Ask Question
7 June, 23:29

Which approach seemed to give values closer to your actual height? the formula using only gender or the formula using both ethnicity and gender? why do you think this is the case?

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 8 June, 02:58
    0
    It is in all likelihood the formula that utilized both ethnicity and gender that gave values nearer to your genuine height. The reason is that distinctive ethnicities have a tendency to have certain highlights in like manner, and one of those highlights is a novel connection between bone length and tallness. Since the formulas that incorporate ethnicity and gender will probably coordinate all the more intimately with the qualities that are particular to your race, these recipes will probably work.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which approach seemed to give values closer to your actual height? the formula using only gender or the formula using both ethnicity and ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers