Ask Question
20 September, 19:05

in katz v united states the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the? A fourth amendment B second amendment C First amendment D ninth amendment

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 20 September, 20:48
    0
    Answer: A. Fourth amendment.

    Explanation: "The right of the people to the security of their persons, homes, documents, and belongings in the face of arbitrary searches and searches shall be inviolable, and no junction shall be issued, but by virtue of probable cause, supported by oath or promise, describing the place that must be registered and the persons or things that must be arrested or seized" IV amendment to the constitution of the United States (1791).
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “in katz v united states the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the? A fourth amendment B second ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers