What did the Supreme Court say in the case of Abington School District v. Schempp? The Bible is worthy of study. Public schools can teach about the religious aspects of holidays. The Constitution does not require a complete separation of "church and state." Public schools can teach about the Ten Commandments.

School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U. S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8-1) that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held, violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from making any law "respecting an establishment of religion." (The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)

Explanation:

School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U. S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8-1) that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held that to violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from making any law "respecting an establishment of religion." (The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)