A person is accused of robbing a convenience store in California, speeding and eluding police while carrying stolen goods in Oregon, and resisting arrest in Washington State. Which of the following is correct? The trial would begin in each state court of original jurisdiction and go separately to state appellate courts if any of the charges are appealed. The trial would begin in an U. S. District Court for the circuit and go to the U. S. Court of Appeals if either party challenges the verdict. The trial would only begin and end in the federal circuit court system in each state where the crimes are alleged to have happened. The trial would begin in a state-level appellate court and go to the federal court of appeal if the verdict is challenged.
+4
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A person is accused of robbing a convenience store in California, speeding and eluding police while carrying stolen goods in Oregon, and ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Home » Social Studies » A person is accused of robbing a convenience store in California, speeding and eluding police while carrying stolen goods in Oregon, and resisting arrest in Washington State.