Ask Question
20 January, 22:18

In what case did the Supreme Court rule that confessions cannot be introduced as evidence unless they were offered after police advised the suspect of his or her legal rights?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 21 January, 00:21
    0
    In the Supreme Court case of Miranda versus Arizona, the Supreme Court rule that confessions cannot be introduced as evidence unless they were offered after police advised the suspect of his or her legal rights was passed. This case took place in the year 1966. It is important that the accused is made aware of his legal rights and not forced to commit something that goes against him or her in the court of law.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In what case did the Supreme Court rule that confessions cannot be introduced as evidence unless they were offered after police advised the ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers