Ask Question
27 May, 04:20

The Sixth Amendment was interpreted in

Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 27 May, 04:48
    0
    The third choice is the answer
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The Sixth Amendment was interpreted in Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights Gideon ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers