Ask Question
28 April, 18:28

The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

Demands on food resources in Africa increase

Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease

Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers

Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 28 April, 18:57
    0
    The answer to your question would be the second statement. I think that the incidents of starvation-related illness decrease would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. In this case, if the Federal government approved additional funding for food resources in Africa.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers