The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?
Demands on food resources in Africa increase
Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease
Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers
Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Aristotle's theory of a person's "function" said that:
Answers (1)
How can the government restrict the exercise of religious belief?
Answers (1)
How did the introduction of the horse affect agricultural production in the New World?
Answers (1)
Who was put on trial in 1633 for contradicting the roman catholic church by arguing that earth moved around the sun.
Answers (1)
What is Hawaii made up of
Answers (1)
New Questions in Social Studies
Which is the correct MLA format for citing an online newspaper article?
Answers (1)
Mesopotamia was the location for a empire found by
Answers (1)
What immediate effect will the pieds-noirs have on these native Algerians' lives?
Answers (1)
According to a Gallup poll, about 90% of all American adults owned a cell phone at the time of the poll. The results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected national sample of 998 adults, 18 years and older.
Answers (1)
What were the three main goals of the colony of Jamestown
Answers (1)