Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. The scientist concludes that a diverse group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. Why should are some scientists skeptical of the scientist's results and conclusion?
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Isabella d'Este's portrait was painted by Titian, and Castiglione's by Raphael, two famous painters. What does this tell you about the subjects' social status?
Answers (1)
As a result of discrimination during the 19th century, where were many Jews in eastern Europe forced to live what?
Answers (2)
Which word means a landowner in the Dutch colonies who ruled over large areas of land
Answers (1)
Womanizer Womanizer Wo-Womanizer (Whats the next lyric?)
Answers (1)
Sharecropping gave African Americans in the South the opportunity to set their own wages. set their own working hours. break the cycle of debt. break the cycle of dependence.
Answers (1)
New Questions in Social Studies