Which of the following is an example of an interpretation (i. e., not an observation) ?

a. Super-recognizer ability appears to run in families, wherein super-recognizers sometimes have super-recognizer parents

b. Different research and law enforcement groups are studying the scientific validity of the super-recognizer phenomenon

c About 2-2.5% of the general population has extremely poor facial recognition abilities

d. A small segment of society (1-2%) has demonstrated extraordinary abilities on facial recognition tests

e. Super-recognizer identification works as well as DNA or fingerprint identification

Question

Biology

Guest

21 February, 00:03

Which of the following is an example of an interpretation (i. e., not an observation) ?

a. Super-recognizer ability appears to run in families, wherein super-recognizers sometimes have super-recognizer parents

b. Different research and law enforcement groups are studying the scientific validity of the super-recognizer phenomenon

c About 2-2.5% of the general population has extremely poor facial recognition abilities

d. A small segment of society (1-2%) has demonstrated extraordinary abilities on facial recognition tests

e. Super-recognizer identification works as well as DNA or fingerprint identification

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Orion York · Answer 1

Super-recognizer identification works as well as DNA or fingerprint identification.

Explanation:

Interpretation may be defined as the way to explain or understand the given information. The observation requires the proper way to look at the given information.

Interpretation is quite important while explaining any scientific methodology and in the explanation of the scientific result. The fingerprint identification or super-recognizer identification has been used for the interpretation of the application of DNA fingerprinting.

Thus, the correct answer is option (e).