Ask Question
16 December, 12:10

Suppose that Jack and Sophia and Hal enter into an agreement for the sale of the business without the non-competition agreement. Jack states that he would probably sign the non-competition agreement if they included an extra $100,000. A month later, Hal and Sophia bring Jack $100,000. What is the result? A. Jack cannot change his mind, since he stated that he would probably accept $100,000 additional for the non-competition agreement. B. If Jack does not accept the $100,000, he may not sell the frozen food, but only for a reasonable amount of time. C. If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause. D. If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is no valid contract for the sale of the business or for the non-competition agreement.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 16 December, 14:34
    0
    The answer is: C) If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause.

    Explanation:

    Non competition clause (NCC) is a legal contract that binds one party to not work for or start a rival company (in the same trade) that will compete against the other party.

    In this case, Jack said he would probably agree to sign a NCC if they paid him $100,000 more, but he never said he would sign for sure the NCC. So Jack can refuse to sign the NCC and reject the extra $100,000. The selling contract would still be valid, it was never stated that if no NCC was signed, then the contract would be dismissed.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Suppose that Jack and Sophia and Hal enter into an agreement for the sale of the business without the non-competition agreement. Jack ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers