Ask Question
23 June, 17:23

The Hoffmans were having their home remodeled by All-Right Contractors. The roof had to be removed in order to build the second story the Hoffmans had contracted and designed to build. After All-Right had removed the roof, but before a covering was placed over the exposed half of the home, All-Right's foreman said the job would cost an additional $12,500. The Hoffmans refused to agree to the additional fees and All-Right's foreman said, ""Suit yourselves. Looks like rain for the next day or two,"" and left. The Hoffmans called All-Right and agreed to pay the $12,500 extra and went in to sign the paperwork. Which of the following statements is true?

a. The contract for the additional $12,500 is valid and binding.

b. The contract for the additional $12,500 is invalid because of duress.

c. The contract was not valid because of duress, but the Hoffmans signed anyway - so there is a valid and enforceable agreement.

d. none of the above

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 23 June, 21:10
    0
    I believe that the contract for the additional $12,500 is a valid contract but can be voided by the Hoffmans if they prove that duress was established, so it is a voidable contract.

    Explanation:

    In legal terms duress means that someone was illegally forced to accept a contract or perform an action. In this case the Hoffmans were victims of duress since All-Right's foreman forced them to accept the price increase or there house would be in bad shape due to rain. It's like a doctor asking more money in the middle of an operation or else he will stop operating.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The Hoffmans were having their home remodeled by All-Right Contractors. The roof had to be removed in order to build the second story the ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers