Plaintiffs purchased state lottery tickets and were winners along with 76 others. The state had advertised that $1,750,000 would be the prize, but it distributed only $744,471. Plaintiff sued the lottery director, alleging fraud in the conduct of the lottery. The state lottery law provides for administrative hearings upon complaints charging violations of the lottery law or of regulations thereunder. It also allows any party adversely affected by a final order of the administrative agency to seek judicial review. Must the plaintiffs exhaust their administrative remedies? Why or why not?

Question

Business

Nora Meyers

23 June, 17:16

Plaintiffs purchased state lottery tickets and were winners along with 76 others. The state had advertised that $1,750,000 would be the prize, but it distributed only $744,471. Plaintiff sued the lottery director, alleging fraud in the conduct of the lottery. The state lottery law provides for administrative hearings upon complaints charging violations of the lottery law or of regulations thereunder. It also allows any party adversely affected by a final order of the administrative agency to seek judicial review. Must the plaintiffs exhaust their administrative remedies? Why or why not?

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Mcdowell · Answer 1

yes Because the state lottery provides for administrative hearings

Explanation:

The plaintiffs must exhaust their administrative remedies before a court of law would grant them the opportunity to pursue a legal action against the lottery board because it might a breach in communication or administration from the lottery board or the lottery director and the plaintiffs should seek to resolve the issues without having to seek a legal action but through administrative remedies and procedures which more swift in resolving such issues