Ask Question
14 September, 20:25

Suppose that Jack, Sophia, and Hal enter into a contract to close on the business without the non-competition agreement. Jack states that he would probably sign the non-competition agreement if they included an extra $100,000. A month later, Hal and Sophia bring Jack $100,000. What is the result?

a. Jack cannot change his mind, since he stated that he would probably accept $100,000 additional for the non-competition agreement.

b. If Jack does not accept the $100,000, he may not sell the frozen food, but only for a reasonable amount of time.

c. If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause.

d. If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is no valid contract for the sale of the business or for the non-competition agreement.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 14 September, 22:50
    0
    c. If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause.

    Explanation:

    If Jack, Sophia, and Hal enter into a contract to close on the business without the non-competition agreement, and Jack stated that he would probably sign the non-competition agreement if they included an extra $100,000.

    If a month later, Hal and Sophia bring Jack $100,000. the result will be If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause.

    Jack CAN change his mind, since he stated that he would probably accept $100,000 additional for the non-competition agreement.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Suppose that Jack, Sophia, and Hal enter into a contract to close on the business without the non-competition agreement. Jack states that ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers