Ask Question
3 September, 06:52

The arguments for restricting trade Suppose there is a policy debate regarding the United States' imposing trade restrictions on imported tires. Read the following scenario and answer the question that follows. Domestic producers of tires send a lobbyist to the U. S. government to request that the government impose trade restrictions on imports of tires. The lobbyist claims that the U. S. tire industry is new and cannot currently compete with foreign firms. However, if trade restrictions were temporarily imposed on tires, the domestic tire industry could mature and adjust and would eventually be able to compete in the world market. Which of the following justifications is the lobbyist using to argue for the trade restriction on semiconductors? a. Unfair-competition argument b. Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument c. National-security argument d. Infant-industry argument e. Jobs argument

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 3 September, 10:18
    0
    Infant-industry argument

    Explanation:

    Infant-industry argument says that a particular industry can't compete with other international competitors because of the economies of scale. So, they demand a temporary protection until they gain economies of scale to be ready to compete on a level playing field.

    Note: This can also come in the category of 'unfair competition' argument as huge economies of scales of well established companies create an unfair environment for nascent industries to compete on a same level.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The arguments for restricting trade Suppose there is a policy debate regarding the United States' imposing trade restrictions on imported ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers