The arguments for restricting trade Suppose there is a policy debate regarding the United States' imposing trade restrictions on imported tires. Read the following scenario and answer the question that follows. Domestic producers of tires send a lobbyist to the U. S. government to request that the government impose trade restrictions on imports of tires. The lobbyist claims that the U. S. tire industry is new and cannot currently compete with foreign firms. However, if trade restrictions were temporarily imposed on tires, the domestic tire industry could mature and adjust and would eventually be able to compete in the world market. Which of the following justifications is the lobbyist using to argue for the trade restriction on semiconductors? a. Unfair-competition argument b. Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument c. National-security argument d. Infant-industry argument e. Jobs argument

Question

Business

Preston Townsend

3 September, 06:52

The arguments for restricting trade Suppose there is a policy debate regarding the United States' imposing trade restrictions on imported tires. Read the following scenario and answer the question that follows. Domestic producers of tires send a lobbyist to the U. S. government to request that the government impose trade restrictions on imports of tires. The lobbyist claims that the U. S. tire industry is new and cannot currently compete with foreign firms. However, if trade restrictions were temporarily imposed on tires, the domestic tire industry could mature and adjust and would eventually be able to compete in the world market. Which of the following justifications is the lobbyist using to argue for the trade restriction on semiconductors? a. Unfair-competition argument b. Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument c. National-security argument d. Infant-industry argument e. Jobs argument

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Emilee Johnston · Answer 1

Infant-industry argument

Explanation:

Infant-industry argument says that a particular industry can't compete with other international competitors because of the economies of scale. So, they demand a temporary protection until they gain economies of scale to be ready to compete on a level playing field.

Note: This can also come in the category of 'unfair competition' argument as huge economies of scales of well established companies create an unfair environment for nascent industries to compete on a same level.