There are benefits to having only permanent employees at a company, and there are benefits to replacing such employees with temporary workers. Which do you think is better for a company. Why?

Question

Business

Lucas Peters

17 August, 00:59

There are benefits to having only permanent employees at a company, and there are benefits to replacing such employees with temporary workers. Which do you think is better for a company. Why?

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Maddison Bridges · Answer 1

I think that having permanent employees is better because they will have more experience and you will get to see the type of person they are.

Jessie Graham · Answer 2

It is better for a company to hire permanent employees.

Explanation:

When a company hires permanent employees, it does so with the purpose of not having to use new people for the company.

Those who are permanent must be taught the task they will perform in the company and what they have to do.

But that changes when temporary workers are hired. Since it's time to teach them all the information about what they have to do with the company.

A permanent knows how to do his job and improves over time in exchange for the promise of a better salary.