Ask Question
25 June, 07:20

The energy needed to remove one electron from a gaseous potassium atom is only about two-thirds as much as that needed to remove one electron from a gaseous calcium atom, yet nearly three times as much energy as that needed to remove one electron from K1 as from Ca1. What expla - nation can you give for this contrast?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 25 June, 08:08
    0
    Ionization of K + will affect the inert gas core of the atom while ionization of Ca + will not.

    Explanation:

    Potassium loses one electron in its outermost shell to become K + it now has an inert or noble gas electron configuration; it is not quite energetically costly to ionize potassium.

    Removing an electron from K + removes an electron from a closed shell (inert gas configuration) since its outermost shell now contains exactly eight electrons. However, losing an electron from Ca + gives Ca2+, which now has a closed shell or inert gas configuration
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The energy needed to remove one electron from a gaseous potassium atom is only about two-thirds as much as that needed to remove one ...” in 📘 Chemistry if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers