Ask Question
10 February, 10:21

What methods of constitutional interpretation do justices commonly use to decide cases?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 10 February, 11:19
    0
    I would say that judges would most likely use precedent in cases of constitutional interpretation for support in coming up with a verdict and thus arrive at a verdict that was in accordance with an already accepted practice historically.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “What methods of constitutional interpretation do justices commonly use to decide cases? ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers