Ask Question
9 September, 12:58

Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplification a when analyzing sources?

A. Sound generalizations are very convincing as a form of rhetoric.

B. Sound generalizations make claims of fact rather than claims of value.

C. Sound generalizations allow historians to ignore contradictory evidence.

D. Sound generalizations can accommodate a variety of complex sources.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 9 September, 15:29
    0
    C. Sound generalizations allow historians to ignore contradictory evidence.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplification a when analyzing sources? A. Sound generalizations are very ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers