Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplification a when analyzing sources?
A. Sound generalizations are very convincing as a form of rhetoric.
B. Sound generalizations make claims of fact rather than claims of value.
C. Sound generalizations allow historians to ignore contradictory evidence.
D. Sound generalizations can accommodate a variety of complex sources.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplification a when analyzing sources? A. Sound generalizations are very ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How did populist governments in brazil and argentina attempt to rule?
Answers (1)
What was the significance of the adoption of Orthodox Christianity by Kievan Russia?
Answers (2)
True or false: Italy's Mussolini was aligned with Hitler as soon as Hitler came to power in 1933. Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answer: (Choice A) A True (Choice B) B False
Answers (1)
After the civil war what was needed to bring the nation back together
Answers (1)
Peter the great and Catherine the great changed Russia by
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Does nationalism always unify people? Why or why not? (3 Sentences)
Answers (1)
Why would a company sell stock? a) to pay taxes b) to expand its business c) to avoid paying taxes d) to increase demand for goods
Answers (1)
Explain how Babe Ruth changed the face of sports.
Answers (1)
Two problems that's the us had in the war of vietnam
Answers (1)
Wasn't there 21 trustees in the making of Georgia.
Answers (1)