Ask Question
4 February, 15:58

Which statement is true?

O

A. U. S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by

military intervention.

O

B. U. S. Dollar Diplomacy meant that U. S. businesses had no power in

Latin America

O

C. U. S. Dollar Diplomacy was never effective in Latin America.

O

D. U. S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America meant that the United

States would never use military force.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 4 February, 17:30
    0
    Of all the option given about the dollar diplomacy of United States, the correct answer is "U. S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by military intervention".

    Answer: Option A

    Explanation:

    The Dollar Diplomacy of United States was all about foreign policy which aided for the creation of stability promoting the American interest in commerce over the globe through China and West Africa.

    But the foreign policy was intervened with military intervention accompanying to the Latin America. The dollar diplomacy failed to create the stability in commercial interest with the failure of aim to abandon the military intervention from the Latin America in due course of revolutionary times.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which statement is true? O A. U. S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by military intervention. O B. U. S. Dollar ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers