Ask Question
3 July, 19:17

Investigator Robbins is charged with collecting DNA from a crime scene. What piece of evidence would not be useful for DNA testing?

Saliva from a discarded cigarette butt

The suspect's boot prints in the mud

A stray hair found clasped in the victim's hand

Tape used to cover the victim's mouth

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 3 July, 20:05
    0
    Answer: The Boot Print in the mud

    Explanation:

    There would be no DNA in the mud just shape of the boot. The hair spray would have the victims finger prints, the tape would most likely have the suspects finger prints, and the saliva is obviously DNA
  2. 3 July, 22:47
    0
    The suspect's boot print in the mud.

    Explanation:

    The boot print in the mud is by-far the least likely to carry any samples of DNA or other genetic materials.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Investigator Robbins is charged with collecting DNA from a crime scene. What piece of evidence would not be useful for DNA testing? Saliva ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers