History

Guest

15 July, 01:14

What was the significance of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of

Education?

"Separate but equal" schools were inherently unequal and unconstitutional

The principle of "separate but equal" schools was acceptable.

Public school choice was no longer legal

School curriculum must include information on the civil rights movement.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “What was the significance of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education? "Separate but equal" schools were ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Which part of the new deal was most directly responsible for creating new jobs?

Select the correct answer. Which religion has the most followers in France? A. Lutheranism B. Judaism C. Anglicanism D. Catholicism

Are dictators defined by their extremism? How do their extreme acts define their leadership?

Why did Andrew Jackson oppose a United States Bank? A. He could not select a city in which to build it and wanted that authority. B. He saw Congress as too corrupt to run it and believed it was unconstitutional. C.

As Vice President Lyndon b Johnson (blank)

New Questions in History

Why did Japan attack Pearl Harbor? The United States was Mexico's ally. Britain came to the aid of the Soviet Union. Americans were killed on the Lusitania. The United States refused to sell oil to Japan

Why is UK leaving the European Union?

Which of the following would be considered a non renewable resource? Sun wind lumber petroleum

What is the significance of the eagle's stance? The eagle represents the willingness of the United States to use force to protect its territories. The eagle shows that the United States has expanded enough.

What "loophole" is left in the amendment, that could potentially allow for some kind of involuntary servitude to continue?