Ask Question
25 June, 18:07

23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime

must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one?

a. Gideon v. Wainwright

b. Yates v. United States

C. Miranda v. Arizona

d. Roe v. Wade

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 25 June, 21:13
    0
    A is the correct answer
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime must be provided with an attorney if he or she was ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers