Ask Question
LawLaw
5 April, 00:55

Do you think that expert witnesses should be paid in court? Why or why not?

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 5 April, 01:25
    0
    Answer:Yes

    Explanation:

    If it was a normal witness they shouldn't be paid because they are only telling what they saw. But if it is a expert witness who is going out of their way to say information. They should be paid, because they are not forced by law to talk.
  2. 5 April, 02:19
    0
    No

    Explanation:

    An expert witness should NOT be paid in court. If you were a victim in a crime, you would want anyone who saw anything to speak up about what they witnessed, so they can identify the suspect. You shouldn't be rewarded for doing the right thing.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Do you think that expert witnesses should be paid in court? Why or why not? ...” in 📘 Law if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
After graduating from college, Jeremy worked hard for 15 years, saving money to buy his dream property. Finally, Jeremy spent all his savings to buy a 300-acre farm with a splendid house and pool. Sadie, an old college friend, stops by.
Answers (1)
Is it important that both part of Congress (the house and senate) can change/improve the bill?
Answers (1)
Who argued that deviance has benefits for society? A. Sigmund Freud B. Albert Bandura C. Paul Topinard o D. Emile Durkheim Reset
Answers (2)
The 1898 treaty of paris dealt with which territory or territories?
Answers (2)
Can a teacher take your phone away?
Answers (2)
New Questions in Law
Why is Nuclear power better that wind power
Answers (2)
A school district supplied school bus service for all children 12 years of age or under who lived at least one mile from school. This service was provided for transportation to and from school.
Answers (1)
Which components are part of all scientific investigations? Check all that apply. scientific question procedure hypothesis variables control conclusion
Answers (1)
In the Katz vs United States case what is the constitutional issue involved in this case
Answers (1)
The contiguous United States can best be described as A. the District of Colombia B. the two US states not connected to another US state. C. the fifty US states and their capitals. D.
Answers (2)
Home » Law » Do you think that expert witnesses should be paid in court? Why or why not?
Sign Up Forgot Password?