Ask Question
14 November, 06:24

Suggest reasons why poaching for subsistence is likely to be less damaging to the biodiversity of an area than poaching for profit

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 14 November, 07:01
    0
    An example for ruining a biodiversity is fishing. The two factors that have contributed to increased fishing in deep ocean waters in recent years are the human population growth and decreased fishing opportunities inshore. Increase population growth increases the demand for food which also leads to increase in fish demand. Because the fish demand is high, inshore fishing opportunities decrease that is why deep ocean waters is the new venue for fishing. This may sound absurd but poaching for subsistence is likely to be less damaging to he biodiversity of an area than poaching for profit. Because the people do not care anymore to the biodiversity that they interrupted just to get back more profit. They do not care what must be taken from it like getting bigger fishes and leaving the smaller ones behind to maintain productivity.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Suggest reasons why poaching for subsistence is likely to be less damaging to the biodiversity of an area than poaching for profit ...” in 📘 Physics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers