Ask Question
30 November, 10:18

Explain why the year 1800 was not a leap year, even though years divisible by four are normally considered to be leap years.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 30 November, 12:09
    0
    Answer and Explanation:

    The year which is directly divided by 400 will be a leap year and by 4 for example 2000 1600 are leap year because they are directly divided by 400 and the year 1700 and 1800 although they are divided by 4 but not by 400 so they are not leap year, This is the reason even 1800 is divided by 4 but not a leap year
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Explain why the year 1800 was not a leap year, even though years divisible by four are normally considered to be leap years. ...” in 📘 Physics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers