Ask Question
19 February, 21:08

A common critique of putting too much power in the executive branch is that doing so can lead to infringement of the Constitution. A critique of putting too little power in the executive branch is that doing so can create a dysfunctional central government. Which critique do you find more persuasive and why?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 19 February, 23:13
    0
    I found that : "putting too little power in the executive branch is that doing so can create a dysfunctional central government." is a more persuasive critique.

    Explanation:

    When operating a large country like united states, it is almost impossible to make each states are taken care of unless we give a certain level of autonomy for each states to govern themselves.

    This ability to govern creates a possibilities that each states could rebel and do things that make it hard for the central government to achieve its goal.

    To prevent this from happening, it is important for the central government to have a complete authority over the state. So when the state use its autonomy to deviate, the central government could easily take a corrective measure and bring the state on track.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A common critique of putting too much power in the executive branch is that doing so can lead to infringement of the Constitution. A ...” in 📘 Social Studies if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers